Nestle reached a deal to market Starbucks coffee products in grocery stores and other retail outlets for $7.15 billion on May 7.
Nestle won’t get any physical assets in the deal, which is expected to close by the end of 2018 after regulator review. The company will use the name recognition of Starbucks to help it in the U.S., where analysts stated Nestle’s flagship coffee brand, Nescafe, is seen as a boring, mass-market brand, while its higher-end Nespresso has failed to garner widespread appeal, reported Seattle Times (May 7).
Nestle is buying the rights to market, sell and distribute bags of Starbucks coffee beans and instant coffee in grocery markets beyond North America, which Starbucks has not done on a larger scale, and expand its line of single-serve capsules to include Starbucks coffee and teas. Additionally, Nestle will sell other brands owned by Starbucks, such as Seattle’s Best Coffee, Teavana tea and Torrefazione Italia coffee. The deal bears similarities to a marketing arrangement Starbucks had with Kraft until 2011.
For Nestle, which purchased a stake in 2017 in high-end coffee company Blue Bottle, the deal bolsters the company to better compete with JAB Holdings, who in recent years purchased the coffee businesses and brands associated with Peet’s, Caribou, Stumptown and Krispy Kreme Doughnuts. Starbucks’ deal with JAB to create single-serve coffee for its Keurig brewers is unaffected by the agreement with Nestle.
Nestle will inherit about 500 Starbucks employees who will remain based in Seattle, WA. Starbucks will continue to produce the coffee products in North America, while Nestle will be in charge of manufacturing in the rest of the world. The agreement does not include bottled drinks like iced coffees and Frappuccinos that are made by Pepsi and sold in and outside of Starbucks stores.
Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson said the company will use proceeds from the deal for its key markets, China and the U.S., the latter receiving funding for a digital push to counteract slowing U.S. growth. Additionally, the company will use the proceeds for a 33% increase in planned dividends and stock buybacks.
For the full story, go to this week’s Food Institute Report.
Quick-service, fast-casual and full-service used to be three distinct restaurant categories. Now, as consumer preferences for convenience and value change, foodservice outlets are beginning to blur the lines between their respective sectors.read more
Expiration date labels on food and drinks have been the subject of confusion for many years, as shoppers struggle to understand the difference between "Best By," "Use By," "Best If Used By" and other phrases. Regulators have attempted to standardize these marks, but until recently, little progress has been made.read more
Chris focuses on fresh, canned and frozen fruit and fresh and dried vegetables for the Food Institute Report. In addition, he assists in compiling data for various Food Institute publications throughout the year. He is a proud Rutgers University alumnus with a degree in English, and has a background in web writing for a variety of industries, including legal, foodservice and small-to-medium sized businesses. In his downtime you can find him watching New York Yankees baseball, hiking, enjoying live music and spending time with his dog Kaiden. He invites you to contact him via email at email@example.com to talk about anything food-related.
10 Mountainview Road
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Food Institute reps are available to answer your questions
BECOME A MEMBER
For close to 90 years, The Food Institute has been the best "single source" for food industry executives, delivering actionable information daily via email updates, weekly through The Food Institute Report and via a comprehensive web research library. Our information gathering method is not just a "keyword search."