In an escalating trade war, it would appear the cavalry is en route for U.S. agricultural producers.
USDA will authorize up to $12 billion in programs designed to help U.S. agricultural producers contend with tariffs instituted by China on U.S. goods, according to a press release issued by the agency July 24. The $12 billion is in line with the estimated $11 billion impact of the Chinese tariffs, and is expected to help producers navigate disrupted markets.
Specifically, the program will include three aspects:
“This is a short-term solution to allow President Trump time to work on long-term trade deals to benefit agriculture and the entire U.S. economy,” USDA Secretary Sonny Perdue said. “The President promised to have the back of every American farmer and rancher, and he knows the importance of keeping our rural economy strong. Unfortunately, America’s hard-working agricultural producers have been treated unfairly by China's illegal trading practices and have taken a disproportionate hit when it comes illegal retaliatory tariffs. USDA will not stand by while our hard-working agricultural producers bear the brunt of unfriendly tariffs enacted by foreign nations. The programs we are announcing today help ensure our nation’s agriculture continues to feed the world and innovate to meet the demand.”
Responses to aid were mixed. “While we’re grateful the administration is doing something, we’re hopeful these tariff issues will be resolved soon because farmers would rather trade than take aid,” said Joel Rotz, Pennsylvania Farm Bureau spokesman, reported TribLive (July 24). Many other agricultural professionals expressed a similar mixture of relief and worry regarding the tariff situation.
The announcement comes as the EU explores its own options. The EU indicated it is ready to launch tariffs on U.S. products worth $20 billion if the U.S. institutes a tariff program on European goods. The EU Trade Commissioner noted the tariffs would affect a variety of industries, including agriculture, reported Yakima Herald-Republic (July 25).
As always, stay tuned to the Food Institute for more information regarding the developing tariff situation.
Quick-service, fast-casual and full-service used to be three distinct restaurant categories. Now, as consumer preferences for convenience and value change, foodservice outlets are beginning to blur the lines between their respective sectors.read more
Expiration date labels on food and drinks have been the subject of confusion for many years, as shoppers struggle to understand the difference between "Best By," "Use By," "Best If Used By" and other phrases. Regulators have attempted to standardize these marks, but until recently, little progress has been made.read more
Chris focuses on fresh, canned and frozen fruit and fresh and dried vegetables for the Food Institute Report. In addition, he assists in compiling data for various Food Institute publications throughout the year. He is a proud Rutgers University alumnus with a degree in English, and has a background in web writing for a variety of industries, including legal, foodservice and small-to-medium sized businesses. In his downtime you can find him watching New York Yankees baseball, hiking, enjoying live music and spending time with his dog Kaiden. He invites you to contact him via email at email@example.com to talk about anything food-related.
10 Mountainview Road
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Food Institute reps are available to answer your questions
BECOME A MEMBER
For close to 90 years, The Food Institute has been the best "single source" for food industry executives, delivering actionable information daily via email updates, weekly through The Food Institute Report and via a comprehensive web research library. Our information gathering method is not just a "keyword search."