When it comes to regulatory legal battles, it is often the case that two opposing sides are pitted against each other. Washington state is contending with an interesting situation regarding proposed discharge permits for dairies and other concentrated animal feeding operations: it's facing opposition from both environmental groups and the dairy industry for very different reasons.
The state's Department of Ecology is scheduled to implement the permit early in March, and it would require Washington dairy and concentrated animal feed operations to reduce the risk of mismanaged or over-applied manure from running to nearby streams. The measure is intended to prevent environmental damage and to protect the public health, reported Yakima Herald-Republic (Feb. 22).
Several environmental groups filed appeals to challenge the permit with the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Such groups argue that the permit isn't stringent enough, specifically in the Lower Yakima Valley. Andrea Rodgers, an attorney with the Western Environmental Law Center, noted:
“Ecology has spent six years drafting a new waste discharge permit for concentrated animal feed operations and unfortunately the agency has still not written something that protects the waters of Washington... Fortunately, citizens can turn to the courts when agencies don’t comply with their statutory obligations to protect public health and the environment.”
On the other side, the Washington State Dairy Federation and the Washington Farm Bureau have issued an appeal. The two groups argue the cost requirements of the permit could threaten the livelihoods of many local dairies. Attorneys Connie Sue Martin, Elizabeth E. Howard and Virginia Nicholson, who filed the appeal on behalf of the groups, said:
“The CAFO permits are unlawful, unjust, unreasonable, impracticable and economically infeasible, and they impose burdensome requirements."
The state's dairy industry argues that required sampling under the permits are an unnecessary expense that is counter to research. It also notes the Department of Ecology's economic impact analysis severely underestimates the impact of abiding by the proposed requirements.
It is unclear how these two appeals will play out, and with a short timeline, many believe the permit will take effect on its intended date. Either way, stay tuned to Today in Food and The Food Institute Blog for up-to-date information regarding this issue.
Chris focuses on fresh, canned and frozen fruit and fresh and dried vegetables for the Food Institute Report. In addition, he assists in compiling data for various Food Institute publications throughout the year. He is a proud Rutgers University alumnus with a degree in English, and has a background in web writing for a variety of industries, including legal, foodservice and small-to-medium sized businesses. In his downtime you can find him watching New York Yankees baseball, hiking, enjoying live music and spending time with his dog Kaiden. He invites you to contact him via email at email@example.com to talk about anything food-related.
There are no comments, yet. Why don't you add one?
10 Mountainview Road
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Food Institute reps are available to answer your questions
BECOME A MEMBER
For close to 90 years, The Food Institute has been the best "single source" for food industry executives, delivering actionable information daily via email updates, weekly through The Food Institute Report and via a comprehensive web research library. Our information gathering method is not just a "keyword search."