Clicky

The Food Institute Blog

The Food Institute Blog

Quaker Oats Just Another Example of Why Companies Must Be Ready to Defend Their Food Claims
Posted on May 02, 2016 by Chris Campbell

Making a claim about a product is at the center of marketing, and for food sector businesses, this couldn't be more true. Consumers are constantly on the lookout for healthier products, more natural foods and other specialized products, and without proper advertising claims, food companies would miss out on potential customers every day. However, this doesn't mean food claims should be issued without thought; an untrue or misleading claim could lead to fines and class-action lawsuits that can potentially cost businesses millions.

ICYMI: Just last Friday, we published a blog entitled "Class Action Lawsuits Call Food Claims into Question." It seems great minds think alike, as over the weekend, the Los Angeles Times published an excellent piece entitled "Too good to be true? More food companies settling over questionable advertising claims." The piece chronicles the trials and tribulations of Neurobrands LLC, Nutella, Naked Juice and Vitaminwater as they dealt with various court cases centered around health-centric claims. The piece also showcases how these lawsuits are becoming big business: UCLA, UC Berkeley and Harvard University have all added food law departments or classes to deal with the rush of food safety issues. It also highlights California as the epicenter of the outbreak of food-related claims litigation:

"But others say the trend is another example of frivolous lawsuits and liberal California laws. So many food-related suits have been filed in the Northern District of California — where jurors are assumed to be liberal and health-conscious — that it’s known as 'The Food Court.'"

Over the weekend, another prominent brand was implicated in a potential class-action lawsuit: PepsiCo's Quaker Oats brand is under fire from New York and California consumers. The product is advertised as "100% natural" but consumers are arguing that the presence of glyphosate (the active ingredient in weedkiller Roundup) negates the claim. For what it's worth, the level of glyphosate is well below levels established by federal regulators, but the consumers may have a point to argue in court.

While it remains to be seen what will happen with Quaker Oats, food industry executives should be prepared for anything, and that includes potential blow-back from consumer advocacy groups about marketing claims. To be better prepared for future claims, read ourPrimer about the Ongoing Epidemic of Class Action Lawsuits Challenging Food Claims.

 

About the Author

Chris Campbell
Business Writer
The Food Institute

Chris focuses on fresh, canned and frozen fruit and fresh and dried vegetables for the Food Institute Report. In addition, he assists in compiling data for various Food Institute publications throughout the year. He is a proud Rutgers University alumnus with a degree in English, and has a background in web writing for a variety of industries, including legal, foodservice and small-to-medium sized businesses. In his downtime you can find him watching New York Yankees baseball, hiking, enjoying live music and spending time with his dog Kaiden. He invites you to contact him via email at chris.campbell@foodinstitute.com to talk about anything food-related.

Comments

You must be a registered member before commenting. Login or join.

There are no comments, yet. Why don't you add one?