The National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) and the National Grocers Association (NGA) filed a petition with FDA to delay the effective date of a rule on food labeling.
The petition, dated April 5, called for FDA to delay the effective date of May 5 and rewrite the menu labeling rule, seeking to delay the Food Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments final rule and asked FDA to reconsider the section 4205 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
The final rule requires that restaurants and food establishments that are part of a chain with 20 or more locations disclose calorie and other nutrition information for standard menu items, including food on display and self-service food. The rule indicates that "covered establishments" include chains with 20 or more locations, regardless of the type of ownership, including individual franchises, provided the locations offer substantially the same menu items.
However, the two associations argued that the rule itself wasn't clear enough. NACS said in a release:
"The petition requested the stay and re-evaluation because of the confusion the final rule and its guidance create and of how much compliance would cost non-restaurant retailers. NACS and NGA pointed out in their petition that agency staff can't provide clarification on such questions as the distinction between a menu (which would require calorie data) and an advertisement or marketing piece (which would not). Instead, the staff 'admitted that they had not made determinations on these kinds of very basic compliance questions.'"
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) took a strong stance on the petition, arguing that other retailers are disclosing nutritional information. According to Margo Wootan, Director of Nutrition Policy at CSPI:
"If Nathan's Famous can clearly disclose calories for hot dogs, so should 7-11 and supermarkets that sell them. Au Bon Pain, Panera, and Publix supermarkets are already labeling their muffins and other baked goods; other chain supermarkets and convenience stores can too."
Italy will not ratify the EU's free trade agreement with Canada because it does not ensure sufficient protection for the country's specialty foods, according to the country's agriculture minister. The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) will abolish some 98% of customs duties and allow the EU to export more cheese and wine and Canada more pork and beef in quotas that expand over the next six years, reported read more
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) will not be reinstated in the U.S., according to a judgment from the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Washington issued June 5, despite the court's acknowledgement that the removal of the labeling law caused red meat producers in the U.S. harm.read more
Chris focuses on fresh, canned and frozen fruit and fresh and dried vegetables for the Food Institute Report. In addition, he assists in compiling data for various Food Institute publications throughout the year. He is a proud Rutgers University alumnus with a degree in English, and has a background in web writing for a variety of industries, including legal, foodservice and small-to-medium sized businesses. In his downtime you can find him watching New York Yankees baseball, hiking, enjoying live music and spending time with his dog Kaiden. He invites you to contact him via email at firstname.lastname@example.org to talk about anything food-related.
There are no comments, yet. Why don't you add one?
10 Mountainview Road
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Food Institute reps are available to answer your questions
BECOME A MEMBER
For close to 90 years, The Food Institute has been the best "single source" for food industry executives, delivering actionable information daily via email updates, weekly through The Food Institute Report and via a comprehensive web research library. Our information gathering method is not just a "keyword search."