GMO labeling is definitely a hot topic in the industry. Several states have passed or are trying to pass mandatory labeling laws, and many are pushing for a national standard. On the other side, many prefer only voluntary labeling, saying there is still no scientific evidence that GMOs are harmful.
The debate took a new step on Feb. 19 when Senate Agriculture Chairman Pat Roberts of Kansas released draft legislation that would crate a voluntary labeling standard for GMOs across the country, effectively blocking state-by-state mandatory labeling, reported San Diego Union-Tribune. Numerous industry organizations supported the bill, saying it would help avoid the confusing patchwork of state-by-state laws. The following groups released statements:
Other groups also claim mandatory GMO labeling will significantly raise costs for consumers. An economic study by John Dunham and Associates and commissioned by the Corn Refiners Association found that Americans will spend about $1,050 more every year on groceries because of Vermont's mandatory labeling law. The study claims the cost of new labeling systems and switching to more expensive non-GMO ingredients will raise food prices almost 2% in the first year. It argues that GMO labels will be viewed as warnings by consumers, forcing food companies to switch to non-GMO ingredients. It says at a minimum, the Vermont law will cost U.S. consumers about $3.8 billion.
Those in support of mandatory GMO labeling believe consumers' rights are being jeopardized if they do not know what's in their food. Gary Hirshberg, chairman of the national labeling campaign Just Label It, made the following statement about Senator Roberts' proposed voluntary labeling law: "Allowing food companies to make voluntary disclosures will simply perpetuate the status quo that has left consumers in the dark. ...[F]ood leaders like Campbells have shown that mandatory GMO labeling will not increase food prices. As the Senate Committee on Agriculture considers the DARK Act, we reiterate our support for a strong mandatory, national GMO labeling system that gives American consumers the same rights as consumers in 64 nations."
The issue is obviously not black or white, as there are a lot of factors to consider. Do you think companies that label their products for GMO ingredients will lose customers due to higher prices, or gain customers who feel they have a right to know?
It's certainly not over, but farmers and food producers may receive a few months' respite as tariffs in the Sino-U.S. trade war will not escalate for 90 days. Additionally, they can at least look forward to a new normal as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) moves forward to full ratification.read more
Jennette has been with The Food Institute since 2013. As Marketing Director, she is responsible for promoting all Food Institute books, seminars and webinars, as well as writing and editing the Food Institute’s annual publications, such as Food Business Mergers & Acquisitions, The Food Industry Review and The Almanac of the Canning, Freezing, Preserving Industries. Additionally, she writes for and edits the daily news update, Today in Food, and contributes to the weekly Food Institute Report. She has a background in non-profit and environmental marketing, programming and writing, and graduated from Rowan University in 2012 with a degree in Communication Studies.
There are no comments, yet. Why don't you add one?
10 Mountainview Road
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Food Institute reps are available to answer your questions
BECOME A MEMBER
For close to 90 years, The Food Institute has been the best "single source" for food industry executives, delivering actionable information daily via email updates, weekly through The Food Institute Report and via a comprehensive web research library. Our information gathering method is not just a "keyword search."